COMFORTING SELF-DELUSION VS. STARK REALITY

By Irina Severin | Original:  https://tinyurl.com/448vujfw

The picture posted by the National Snow and Ice Data Center https://tinyurl.com/2vywcpw5 is overtly deceptive because it doesn't account for the ice's volume and thickness, which are incomparable to those of 1979, while "ice extent and concentration" are abstract notions that, in themselves, mean nothing. In 1979, according to official data, the average ice thickness was about 3,5 m; now it is less than 1 m, and I doubt that the ice reaches 1 m, as all of the ice in the Arctic is one year old, and Russia conducts massive icebreaking operations in the Arctic to destroy it too.

The multiyear ice completely disappeared, except for some small anomalies that the paleontologists are ruthlessly destroying for no reason. In the 70-s, over two-thirds of the Arctic Basin was covered by thick, resilient multi-year ice, growing up to 5 meters (16 feet) thick.

Whom does the National Snow and Ice Data Center try to deceive, no matter intentionally or unintentionally, and what for? Who is behind the deception - is this the strategic self-deception on the level of a Russia-style "Climate Doctrine", or is it about a Russian infiltration/deception, meant to intentionally distort the real picture with the Arctic ice?

Is this the result of the Musk/DOGE reform of replacing professionals with Russia-aligned saboteurs? The question is more than just serious, as the Arctic is key to global climate and the survival of civilization is at stake. The demise starts from self-deception.

"BLIND SPOT" RUSSIA USES TO WEAPONIZE POLAR VORTEX

 Facebook: https://tinyurl.com/39hmy2t3 

This is what the #Arctic #ice looks like in reality at its best. Does it really matter what the "ice concentration and extent" are, if the picture shows the de facto Ice-free Arctic? Instead of 2050 as planned, the next, 2027, is when the Arctic will officially be recognized as ice-free, while on the National Snow and Ice Data Center map, the Arctic still looks like it did in 1979, when over two-thirds of the Arctic was covered by thick, resilient multi-year ice, growing up to 5 meters.

Moreover, the huge gray area around the North Pole on the map, a so-called "polar data gap" (or satellite data blind spot), is where the Western sensors don't reach and where the Russians concentrate their most destructive operations.

To survive, the blind spot should not only be monitored closely, but also protected from Russian operations and de facto Russian attacks resulting from Russia's intentional disruptions of the Polar Vortex(#PV), or the de facto weaIponization of the Polar Vortex, which is the main driver of most "natural disasters", including tornadoes, blizzards, heat domes, floods, and persistent climate degradation and global warming.

https://tinyurl.com/2vywcpw5